Trusted Execution on Tangle: How TEE Works in the Blueprint SDK
How the Blueprint SDK integrates AWS Nitro, GCP Confidential Space, and Azure CVM for hardware-isolated execution.

Day 6 of the Tangle Re-Introduction Series
This is the final post in our re-introduction series. We've covered why decentralized infrastructure matters, how verification works, the developer experience, and specific AI services. This post is about what comes next.
I'll be direct: this is part roadmap, part vision, part acknowledgment of what we don't know yet. The honest answer to "where is this going?" is "we're building in a direction, learning as we go, and adjusting based on what works."
Where We Are Today
Before looking forward, the honest status:
Traction (as of Q1 2026):
- Mainnet live since [DATE]
- operators actively running services
- [Y] blueprints deployed (FROST, DVN, Hyperlane)
- [Z] TNT staked in collateral
Note: We're early. These numbers are small. We're sharing them because transparency matters more than looking impressive.
Team: [X] people, backgrounds in [cryptography/systems/blockchain]. Backed by [investors/self-funded]. Runway through [timeframe].
What We've Built
Here's what exists today:
Tangle Network - A blockchain purpose-built for coordinating off-chain services. Operators register, stake collateral, and run services. Customers pay for work. Verification and slashing happen on-chain.
Blueprint SDK - Rust framework for building services. Handles protocol integration, job routing, fee distribution. You write the logic; the framework handles the plumbing.
Core Blueprints - Production-ready blueprints for threshold signatures (FROST), cross-chain infrastructure (LayerZero DVN, Hyperlane), and MPC protocols.
Developer Tooling - CLI for local development, testing, deployment. Not polished, but functional.
This is infrastructure that works. People are building on it. But we're early, and there's much more to do.
Near-Term: Q1-Q2 2026
Success Metrics for Q1-Q2
What "done" looks like:
- Inference blueprint live with 3+ operators, handling real production traffic
- Sandbox runtime supporting Python/JS with under 2s cold start
- Documentation comprehensive enough that a developer can deploy a blueprint without Discord help
- At least one external team building on blueprints (not us, not friends)
AI Service Blueprints
The previous post outlined inference and sandbox services. These move from design to production:
Inference Service - Verified LLM inference with TEE attestation, model registry, canary checks. Initial support for Llama family models, expanding based on demand.
Sandbox Runtime - Isolated code execution with deterministic replay verification. Python and JavaScript first, then Rust and WASM.
Agent Toolkit - Pre-built patterns for AI agents: tool execution, memory persistence, multi-step reasoning with verification at each step.
Protocol Improvements
Faster finality - Current job settlement takes longer than it should. We're working on optimistic settlement with fraud proofs to reduce latency for trusted operators.
Better operator matching - Right now, customers manually select operators. We're building automated matching based on requirements, reputation, and availability.
Cross-blueprint composition - Using output from one blueprint as input to another without manual coordination. The data analysis agent example from the previous post should be a single transaction, not multiple.
Developer Experience
Documentation overhaul - Honest assessment: our docs have gaps. Q1 priority is comprehensive guides, tutorials, and API references.
VSCode extension - Autocomplete, inline documentation, debugging support. The basics that make development faster.
Blueprint templates - Clone-and-modify starting points for common patterns. Don't start from scratch.
Medium-Term: 2026
The Operator Ecosystem
Today, Tangle has a handful of operators. That works for current demand. It won't work at scale.
Building a healthy operator ecosystem means:
Clear economics - Operators need to understand what they'll earn, what hardware they need, and what risks they take. We're working on better tooling for operators to evaluate blueprints.
Specialization - Some operators will specialize in AI inference (GPUs), some in general compute (CPUs), some in high-security workloads (TEEs). The protocol should support and reward specialization.
Reputation systems - Long-term track records matter. Operators who consistently deliver should be preferred. We're designing reputation that's hard to game and meaningful to customers.
Expanding Verification
Current verification is good but not complete:
Better AI verification - zkML is improving. We're tracking projects like EZKL and Giza. When proof generation becomes practical for common models, we'll integrate it.
Formal verification for blueprints - Proving that blueprint logic is correct, not just that it runs. This is research-grade work, but important for high-stakes services.
Hardware diversity - Currently we support Intel SGX and AMD SEV. Adding ARM TrustZone (for mobile/edge), RISC-V enclaves, and GPU TEEs as they mature.
Integration Layer
Tangle is infrastructure. It's most useful when integrated with other systems:
Agent frameworks - Direct integration with LangChain, AutoGPT, and emerging agent platforms. Call Tangle blueprints as easily as calling an API.
Payment rails - x402 integration is started. Expanding to other payment protocols. Agents should pay for services without manual intervention.
Data availability - For services that need persistent state, integration with Celestia, EigenDA, or similar DA layers.
Long-Term Vision
The Operating Layer for Autonomous Systems
Here's the thesis: as AI agents become more capable, they'll need infrastructure that matches their autonomy. You can't have an autonomous agent that depends on a centralized provider who can turn it off, observe it, or modify its behavior.
Tangle is building the operating layer for this future:
Agents own their infrastructure - Not accounts on someone else's platform, but actual ownership of computation resources, with cryptographic guarantees of independence.
Trust minimization everywhere - Every operation verifiable, every operator accountable, every failure recoverable. Trust is expensive; verification is cheap.
Composable autonomy - Agents using agents using agents, with accountability chains that extend through the entire stack.
We don't know exactly what this looks like. Nobody does. But we're building the primitives that will be needed.
What We're Not Building
Equally important:
Not building agents - We build infrastructure for agents. Others build the agents themselves. We're good at cryptoeconomic protocols; others are good at AI/ML.
Not building another L1 - Tangle is a specialized chain for service coordination. General-purpose L1s exist. We integrate with them rather than competing.
Not building everything in-house - We're a small team. We're building core protocol and critical blueprints. The ecosystem builds everything else.
Focus matters. We're staying focused.
The Competitive Landscape
Being honest about alternatives:
Traditional cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) - Still the right choice for most applications. Better tooling, more mature, lower complexity. Choose Tangle when you specifically need verification, decentralization, or cryptoeconomic accountability.
Other decentralized compute (Akash, Golem, etc.) - Different focus. They're solving for cheaper compute. We're solving for verified compute. Complementary, not competing.
AI-specific platforms (Replicate, Modal, etc.) - Great for standard AI workloads. Less good when you need verification guarantees or can't trust the operator.
Blockchain "AI" projects - Many are vaporware or marketing. We're building actual infrastructure that works. The difference becomes obvious when you try to use it.
What We Need
Tangle succeeds if an ecosystem grows around it. That requires:
Developers building blueprints - The SDK exists. The primitives work. We need people building services: AI inference, code execution, data processing, novel applications we haven't thought of.
Operators running infrastructure - Hardware owners who want to earn by providing verified computation. GPUs, TEE-enabled servers, specialized hardware.
Customers using services - AI agents, applications, developers who need verified computation. Without demand, there's no ecosystem.
Researchers improving verification - zkML, formal methods, new TEE designs. The verification frontier keeps advancing. We need to stay current.
How to Get Involved
Build something - The SDK is available. Pick a service that interests you. Build it. We'll help.
Run an operator - If you have hardware, consider becoming an operator. We're working on documentation for this.
Provide feedback - Use the tools. Tell us what's broken. We're small enough that feedback reaches the people who can fix it.
Join the conversation - Discord is where planning happens. Research discussions, feature requests, bug reports. It's all there.
Closing Thoughts
Six posts ago, we started with a simple observation: AI agents are becoming a workforce, and workforces need infrastructure.
We've covered:
- Why decentralized infrastructure matters for AI
- How blueprints coordinate operators and customers
- What verification mechanisms prove and don't prove
- How to build services on Tangle
- Specific patterns for AI inference and sandboxes
The honest summary: Tangle is early-stage infrastructure that works but isn't polished. We're building something we believe matters, learning as we go, and inviting others to build with us.
If any of this resonates, come talk to us. The Discord link is below.
Thanks for reading.
Drew Stone Founder, Tangle
Links:
Tangle Re-Introduction